|
| Comments on tests: positive and negative together in the same comment.. |
| Record no: |
312 |
| Positive: |
True |
| I thought there was a repetition |
| of 2 questions in the tests = |
| either I misread the first |
| test I took or somehow confused |
| myself if there is actually |
| I feel that having these tests regularly has helped me |
| to learn as I have been going along. Perhaps it would |
| have been useful to have experienced both styles of exam |
| but I have no complaints about doing it this way. |
| Record no: |
313 |
| Positive: |
True |
| I think that this type of exam and assignment, |
| are the only proper ways to examine students on |
| If you had to do a written exam a lot of |
| what you would be required to write would |
| be reference knowledge that you would have to |
| learn inthe work place, as you would look it |
| up. For instance a question involving the Vector |
| class is impossible unless you know the method definations |
| I like this way of testing and consider |
| it fair. The tests were a big help in |
| keeping my nose to the grind-stone. |
| P.S. I didn't like questions phrased |
| 'what is the closest possible output' |
| as this seems to make the answer partly |
| Record no: |
315 |
| Positive: |
True |
| The objective tests have been useful to monitor |
| progress, but they would be more valuable if |
| we could see what questions we got wrong |
| and what the correct answers are. Otherwise |
| it is difficult to know how well you are doing |
| and which areas need more attention. |
| I do prefer this to the traditional tests. |
First
Previous
Next
Last
Page
5
.
|
|
|
|
|