|
| Comments on questions plus some "workings out" |
| Record no: |
330 |
| Question feedback: |
Yes |
| Good - well written exam; no misleading |
| questions, well structured |
| Q featured in both tests A & B. |
| I prefer these tests to written examinations, as it |
| doesn't require you to produce perfect code of the top of your |
| head under exam conditions |
| Record no: |
331 |
| Question feedback: |
Yes |
| When the answers wrap around lines, putting a <HR> after |
| each answer would make them less confusing... |
| Tests during the year are a great idea, as people |
| are encouraged to revise from an early time. |
| The computer versions of the tests were fantastic, as |
| more data could be got about "answering trends" in a |
| way that the test could be updated to make it less |
| ambiguous... in a written test this would not be possible. |
| Its great, I think other departments + modules in CS |
| should do them too. They are fun! |
| Questions were repeated exactly in |
| The other good thing about Q.P is... |
| -> Lecturers don't need to mark |
| papers or feed them through unreliable |
| and often time consuming OMR machines |
| -> There is less chance of mistakes. |
| -> So, there you have it - better for the lecturer, |
| better for the student. Great! |
| Record no: |
332 |
| Question feedback: |
Yes |
| I prefer this instead the paper one, only |
| that the screen sometimes is too small, |
| - or the program is too big too fit on |
| the screen - which makes it |
| harder for the student to follow the |
| 21 May 2001 |
Page 64 of 74 |
First
Previous
Next
Last
Page
64
.
|
|
|
|
|
