|
| Comments on questions plus some "workings out" |
| Record no: |
286 |
| Question feedback: |
Yes |
| The computerised exams are a good concept, but there are some areas of |
| their execution that could be improved, specifically things like grammatical |
| errors and typing errors that make the exams harder to understand in |
| some cases. The impression is given that not enough care is taken in |
| The current feedback from the exams is not particularly helpful, providing |
| only the mark that you achieved. An improvement would be to provide |
| comments that indicate which question areas you had difficulty with. |
| The computerised exams are less stressfull than traditional style ones. |
| Record no: |
287 |
| Question feedback: |
Yes |
| Harder than the usual written exams. |
| It's harder because there is no room for error, |
| no leeway for ambiguous answers that may |
| have got a few marks in the past. More care |
| and effort has to be taken with revision |
| because more of the silabus can be covered |
| inthe time allowed. It pushes students |
| further because they have to understand |
| and know the exact answer to get the |
| marks and know the full silabus. With |
| conventional testing procedures where you |
| answer a few questions from section A and |
| say one from section B. So a certain |
| amount of hedging you bets can be done! |
| With multiple choice (in this case) you need to |
| know everything no chances can be taken. |
| Record no: |
288 |
| Question feedback: |
Yes |
| During the term the tests are a good gauge to know exactly |
| how you are doing with your studies (what you do and dont know) |
| My only criticism being some of the coding is large and the answers |
| arent visable so you have to scroll up and down. Changing text size improves this (sorry) I prefer |
| these tests compared to written test. |
| 21 May 2001 |
Page 52 of 74 |
First
Previous
Next
Last
Page
52
.
|
|
|
|
|
