|
| Comments on questions plus some "workings out" |
| Record no: |
274 |
| Question feedback: |
Yes |
| Question 10: Wouldn't compile; says intStack instead of |
| IntStack. Not sure. Assuming that intStack is a |
| As far as I'm concerned, with these tests, you find yourself |
| stretched further than with written exams, because you have to be |
| able to analyse code & understand what that code is doing, |
| in order to answer the question. With written tests, it's more |
| dificult, both for the candidate and the examiner (I suppose), |
| as everyone will have developed their own particular way of |
| writing code, therefore making it difficult for the examiner to |
| interpret - it's not the examiner who should be tested, but the |
| candidate! Questions written in this way are in a standard form |
| make it mutually easier for both parties. |
| Question 6 - Ambiguity between answers (a) & (b) |
| Questions 7&8 appeared in Test A aswell! - two questions out of |
| eleven repeated; is this going to always be the same? |
| Record no: |
275 |
| Question feedback: |
Yes |
| Need to be harder could do with some |
| code writing like traditional tests I know |
| it means more work for you but it would |
| Would be nice if didn't have to worry about mice |
| and keyboards and such. Possible solutions? a set of |
| exam mice or possible allow people to bring own I'm not sure. |
| Test A Q11 throw exeptiton? How about a tetris |
| Record no: |
276 |
| Question feedback: |
Yes |
| Good idea, allows the student to be properly tested without having to |
| write pages of code, less stressful and proberbly easier to mark. |
| 21 May 2001 |
Page 48 of 74 |
First
Previous
Next
Last
Page
48
.
|
|
|
|
|
